|
BUILDCERT CERTIFICATION SCHEME
PROCEDURES FOLLOWING MISUSE OF BUILDCERT REGISTERED MARKS
The
“BuildCert” name and logo, “TMV2 Scheme” logo, and “TMV3 Scheme” logo
are registered marks of BuildCert Limited.
The
following procedures, in addition to those provided by law for
registered marks, have been agreed by the BuildCert Approvals Scheme and
are reiterated for the existing membership.
· A
3rd party can claim TMV2 or TMV3 approval if the valve’s
unique reference number and licence holder’s name, as stated on the
approval certificate, are used and referred to in all product literature
that claims TMV2 or TMV3 approval.
· The
TMV2 or TMV3 logo must be positioned adjacent to the exact approved
valve and not used to imply that all valves have TMV approval. If the
logo is used remotely then a caveat is required under the logo that
states the unique model number of the approved valve.
· The
use of the words TMV2 or TMV3 approval ‘pending’ or ‘applied for’ is not
acceptable.
· The
following words are acceptable ‘TMV2 or TMV3 approval will be available
from launch’.
· The
use of “TMV2” or “TMV3” as a model number is not acceptable.
The following Procedures must be undertaken following the
misuse of BuildCert’s, TMV2 or TMV3 logo and name or any false claim
that a product is approved by the Scheme
1. The Secretary of the Scheme will be notified of the misuse
or false claim.
2. The Secretary will contact the company making the false
claims to ascertain whether it manufactures the valve or purchases
the valve from a manufacturer. If it purchases the valve from a
manufacturer, the Secretary will ascertain whether the manufacturer
has TMV2/3 approval.
3. If the manufacturer has approval see step 4. If the valve
has no TMV2/3 approval via either the manufacturer or the company
then the Secretary will explain the requirements of the TMV2/3
Scheme and indicate how the company is misusing the logo or name of
the Scheme. If the company is willing to submit an application for
approval, then go to steps 5 and 7. If the company is not willing
to submit an application then go to steps 5 and 6.
4. If the valve has TMV2 or TMV3 approval via the manufacturer
but if the company is making false claims then the Secretary will
explain the requirements as step 3 and will contact the TMV2 or TMV3
licence holder and notify it of the false claims. See step 8.
5. Any manufacturer or company that makes any false claims in
relation to the BuildCert logos, name or Scheme is required to make
a retraction in the publication where the false claims have been
made.
6.
Depending upon the response to initial enquiries, the Scheme
solicitor may be called to formally notify the manufacturer or
company of the misuse of the TMV logo or name and will take any such
steps as may be deemed necessary by the Scheme.
7. In a case of misuse, if the company has included within an
advert the name of the product then the Scheme requires that the
product(s) name be changed prior to any future approval by the
Scheme. This will usually involve literature changes and change to
the identification on the valve.
8. If
the company making the false claims will not make an application for
approval then the manufacturer that has TMV2 or TMV3 approval will
be contacted and will be asked to exert pressure upon the company to
submit an application and to comply with stages 5 and 7. If the
company will not comply then the licence from the manufacturing
company might be withdrawn after consultation with the Scheme
solicitor. See step 6.
The members of the Schemes Technical Assessment Panel
(TAP) will be kept informed of any misuse issues. After each verified
misuse of the Schemes Registered Mark(s) the TAP will issue 1 penalty
point to any existing scheme member, this penalty point will remain
valid for 5 years, after which time it will be deleted. Any penalty
points issued will be notified to the BuildCert Advisory Committee.
Any Scheme member that has three penalty points will have
all their current incidents of misuse reviewed by the TAP who will
advise the BuildCert Advisory Committee upon whether further action
against the Scheme member is required. The Advisory Committee would
then review the misuse incidents that make up the three or more penalty
points and if necessary suspend approval of one or more products for a
period of not more than 12 months.
|